Power Consumption & The Verdict

I have to acknowledge, this just seems wrong. I still can't get used to seeing AMD CPUs consuming less ability than their Intel counterpart. It feels unnatural. Those power-hungry FX fries sat atop our power charts for then long and I'k glad we can finally move on from them.

For what seemed similar a similar level of functioning (nosotros'll become to that in a moment), the R5 1600 consumed quite a lot less power compared to the 7800X. With both chips overclocked, the Ryzen organization consumed fifteen% less power and 18% less earlier nosotros did any overclocking -- a definitive win for AMD. Who predicted this at the beginning of the twelvemonth? I'll admit information technology certainly wasn't me.

We tried to get to the indicate quickly on this i simply in that location's no easy fashion to practise that when benchmarking 30 PC games. Overall, we're impressed with the performance displayed by the Ryzen 5 1600. Granted, it was a good chip from 24-hour interval i but information technology seems like the few months of optimizations have made it even better.

Before we get to our great graph of averages, it's worth noting that later spending an actress two days confirming these results (generally re-testing and comparing the Core i7-7700K and Ryzen five 1600), we can say that while these chips are strangely close in performance, our figures are accurate.

Out of the box the R5 1600 is 13% slower than the more expensive 7700K. Keep in heed, at that place were a few GPU-express games and even worse, a few that were frame-capped, they weren't limited to 60fps. Many had 120fps+ limits, and then the Ryzen CPU was still pushing the GTX 1080 Ti difficult.

Once overclocked, the $215 R5 1600 was just 9% slower than the 7700K, while it matched the $415 7800X. I'm sure you're itching to meet what the overall picture looks like and so we won't look any longer.

Just looking at the 7800X and R5 1600, here are the overclocked results when comparing the minimum frame rates. As we just saw, both averaged a minimum of 103fps across the 30 games tested. We can clearly run across where the R5 1600 enjoyed some wins and suffered through a few loses.

Some readers will undoubtedly declare that I'yard biased towards a certain company, only if that was the case, in that location's no way you would see Deus Ex: Mankind Divided and Gears of War 4 in this list. Meanwhile, if I were biased towards Intel, I'd driblet Total War: Warhammer and Civilization IV.

Information technology'south worth noting that the number of titles won and lost are equal, and fifty-fifty if we were to remove some of the worst performing games for either platform, information technology would only skew the results slightly toward either camp, which is the beauty of testing with such a massive sample of games.

For example, if we remove AMD'southward worst performing title, Gears of War 4, the R5 1600 would get just one% faster than the 7800X. Remove AMD's second worst title, Deus Ex Mankind Divided using DX12, and the R5 1600 is still but 1% faster on average.

Please note that because at that place was a big difference in performance between running Deus Ex: Flesh Divided with DX11 and DX12 with the Ryzen CPU, I included both the results in this graph. Still, I only included DX12 results for Total War: Warhammer and non the DX11 results since the R5 1600 was much faster in both tests. I favored DX12 equally it's the newer API.

If you care at all nearly value, the Ryzen 5 1600 is clearly the fashion to go. This is why we recently named it the best value operation desktop CPU. It was unlikely that the Core i7-7800X was going to change that, only we hoped the performance would at to the lowest degree be a compelling reason to buy Intel's new six-core processor.

Ryzen will hit 4GHz with the box libation but information technology will be a more than mild experience with a $20 aftermarket libation similar the Cooler Principal 212, then keep that in mind. The 7800X on the other mitt cannot exist overclocked to iv.7GHz using a 240mm AIO closed loop solution. Instead, it required a $380 custom loop setup to reach that result.

Shopping shortcuts:

  • AMD Ryzen 5 1600 on Amazon
  • AMD Ryzen 5 1600 on Newegg
  • Intel Core i7-7700K on Amazon
  • Intel Core i7-7700K on Newegg
  • Intel Core i7-7800X on Amazon
  • Intel Core i7-7800X on Newegg

Compared to the 7800X, the R5 1600 deliveres a similar feel once overclocked and even at stock it was but four% slower throughout our benchmarks. Information technology as well consumes less ability, costs considerably less, and comes with a better cooler out of the box. The Ryzen 5 1600 is the obvious choice for gamers.